🔗 Share this article

Through a per curiam order, the highest judicial body cleared the way for Texas to employ a redrawn congressional boundary scheme that could add as many as five new GOP-friendly districts. The 6-3 decision, issued on Thursday, grants a petition by the state to lift a lower court's ruling that had struck down the new map in November.

Court's Rationale

The district court wrongly interjected itself into an ongoing primary campaign, generating significant confusion and disturbing the delicate balance of power in elections, the supreme court said in detailing its action.

The federal court had earlier ruled that Texas had likely grouped voters by their race – a method known as racial gerrymandering – when it passed the boundaries. It had instructed the state to employ the maps created after the 2020 census for the next year's election.

Strong Dissenting Opinion

In a sharply worded objection, Justice Elena Kagan took issue with the majority's decision. She argued that it disregarded the work of the lower court, noting that its ruling was crafted by a judge nominated by former President Donald Trump.

We are a higher court than the district court, but we are not a better one when it comes to making such a fact-based decision, Kagan wrote in a opinion co-signed by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson.

The justice went on, This court's stay ensures that Texas's new map, with all its enhanced political tilt, will control next year's elections. And it guarantees that many Texas voters, without justification, will be grouped in electoral districts because of their race. And that result, as this court has stated repeatedly, is a breach of the law of the land.

National Redistricting Battle

The ruling comes amid a nationwide contest over the remapping of electoral maps. Texas is a crucial component in campaigns to alter the U.S. House map to secure a slim Republican hold. Usually, boundary revision happens after a ten-year survey. Yet the move by Texas Republicans to initiate a aggressive mid-cycle redistricting earlier this year set off a series of events among other states.

Conservative legislators in including North Carolina and Missouri have also passed new maps that might create a number of more conservative seats. Democratic lawmakers, for their part, have countered with revised boundaries in including California and Virginia, which might neutralize those potential gains.

Partisan Responses

Lone Star State AG hailed the High Court's decision. In a release, he said the order defended Texas's prerogative to draw a map that ensures electoral outcomes aligned with Republicans. We are setting the precedent for restoring our country, through each electoral district and individual state, he added.

In contrast, Democratic leaders criticized the decision. The Court's approval of this extreme, racially gerrymandered Texas GOP map is profoundly disappointing, said the head of a major party election organization.

A senior House figure argued the court had yet again shredded its standing by approving a racially gerrymandered map. This decision from the Court's far-right bloc proves extremists are willing to rig elections. The Texas map is a discriminatory power grab targeting Black and Latino voters, he stated.